vciy

CVE-2008-4687

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

manage_proj_page.php in Mantis before 1.1.4 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via a sort parameter containing PHP…

CVE-2008-46873 of 4 sources documented this
57

rank 57 = 25 + 23 + 0 + 9 + 0

rank@v1 · this cycle

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.67453  ·  without this subject the record ranks 32

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 9.0, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 34

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 57

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

13 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 48

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 57

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$3.37Mover the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$3.37M = $4.99M incident cost x 1 exposure x 0.67453 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.67453EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity9 CRITICALreceipt
Harmtotal lossreceipt
Exploitationpublic proof-of-conceptreceipt
Defenseno fix version held
Movementscoring model changedreceipt
STEADY10Holding near 0.67 across 20 observations. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

SonicWall SMA1000langflow-aiMicrosoftRejetto HTTP FileCitrix NetScaler4687

This record is one instance of CWE-94, improper control of generation of code ('code injection'). The index holds 7185 prior instances of this class, 79 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signal

Check a version against this record

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · one authentication · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v2.0 · NVD's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-94 Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')receipt
Published consequencesCWE-94: Access Control: Bypass Protection Mechanism; Access Control: Gain Privileges or Assume Identity; Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability: Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands…[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed inNo fix version in held sources, as the index stood on 15 Jun 2026.
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Proof-of-concept published · 2 public repositories, 2020-05-30.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published · 2 public repositories2020-05-30receipt
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, NVD9 CRITICALreceipt
Exploit probability0.67453 · top 0.72% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth1 product across 1 vendorderived
Assigned bymitrereceipt
Recorded changes23 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Named in the CPE rangesMantisreceipt
Published rangesmantis <= 1.1.3; mantis 0.19.3; mantis 0.19.4; mantis 1.0.1receipt
Show all 13 published ranges
mantis <= 1.1.3
mantis 0.19.3
mantis 0.19.4
mantis 1.0.1
mantis 1.0.2
mantis 1.0.3
mantis 1.0.4
mantis 1.0.5
mantis 1.0.6
mantis 1.0.7
mantis 1.0.8
mantis 1.1.1
mantis 1.1.2

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

manage_proj_page.php in Mantis before 1.1.4 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via a sort parameter containing PHP sequences, which are processed by create_function within the multi_sort function in core/utility_api.php. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
9 AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
weakness
CWE-94
affected versions
mantis <= 1.1.3; mantis 0.19.3; mantis 0.19.4; and 10 more, listed in full below

check it yourself bugs.gentoo.org secunia.com mantisbt.svn.sourceforge.net securityfocus.com gentoo.org mantisbt.org +7 morereceipt

Dated events

2023-03-07EPSS moved 0.85 to 0.972025-03-17EPSS moved 0.96 to 0.812026-06-15EPSS moved 0.79 to 0.67

Movement the material steps

4 Feb 20220.85289
7 Mar 20230.97315 · crossed 0.90 · scoring model v2023.03.01
17 Mar 20250.8078 · crossed 0.90 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.67453 · scoring model v2026.06.15
Show all 20 observations
4 Feb 20220.85289
7 Mar 20230.97315
29 Sep 20230.97247
5 Nov 20230.97166
12 Dec 20230.97109
16 Jan 20240.96768
27 Mar 20240.96320
2 May 20240.96279
7 Jun 20240.96409
17 Dec 20240.96449
16 Feb 20250.96109
17 Mar 20250.8078
19 Mar 20250.84825
20 Mar 20250.8078
27 Mar 20250.84825
28 Mar 20250.78053
29 Mar 20250.84825
30 Mar 20250.78053
28 May 20250.79225
15 Jun 20260.67453

20 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.67453Published2008-10-22Public PoC2020-05-30Index as of2026-06-15

The record had been public for 17 years, 7 months when this index was last written.

Published 2008-10-22 receipt · Public PoC 2020-05-30 receipt · Index as of 2026-06-15 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-94, improper control of generation of code ('code injection'). The index holds 7185 prior instances of this class, 79 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2026-15410 · SonicWall SMA1000nothing comparable heldKEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2025-3248 · langflow-ai langflownothing comparable heldKEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2025-49704 · Microsoft SharePoint Enterprise Server 2016nothing comparable heldKEV listed · 2025receipt
CVE-2024-23692 · Rejetto HTTP File Servernothing comparable heldKEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2023-24955 · Microsoft SharePoint Enterprise Server 2016nothing comparable heldKEV listed · 2023receipt
CVE-2023-3519 · Citrix NetScaler ADCnothing comparable heldKEV listed · 2023receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

7185 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2008-4687.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.