vciy

CVE-2007-1754

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

PUBCONV.DLL in Microsoft Office Publisher 2007 does not properly clear memory when transferring data from disk to memory, which allows user-assisted…

CVE-2007-17543 of 4 sources documented this
33

rank 33 = 8 + 23 + 0 + 2 + 0

rank@v1 · scheduled

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.32782  ·  without this subject the record ranks 25

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 9.3, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 10

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 33

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

1 product in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 31

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 33

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$1.64Mover the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movement+$266,000on 2024-12-17, the last material move, 1 year, 5 months before this reading
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$1.64M = $4.99M incident cost x 1 exposure x 0.32782 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.32782EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity9.3 CRITICALreceipt
Harmtotal loss · unauthenticatedreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseno fix version held
Movementthreshold crossedreceipt
FALLING10Fallen from 0.46718 to 0.32782 across 20 observations. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

CVE-2010-0806Cisco IOSCisco IOS and IOS1754

This record is one instance of CWE-399. The index holds 2695 prior instances of this class, 11 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signalspoke length is how much of the record matches, not how bad it is

Check a version against this record

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no authenticationreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v2.0 · NVD's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-399receipt
Published consequencesMITRE publishes no common consequences for this weakness.[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed inNo fix version in held sources, as the index stood on 15 Jun 2026.
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, NVD9.3 CRITICALreceipt
Exploit probability0.32782 · top 2% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth1 product across 1 vendorderived
Assigned bymicrosoftreceipt
Recorded changes20 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Named in the CPE rangesMicrosoft publisherreceipt
Published rangesmicrosoft publisher 2007receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

PUBCONV.DLL in Microsoft Office Publisher 2007 does not properly clear memory when transferring data from disk to memory, which allows user-assisted remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a malformed .pub page via a certain negative value, which bypasses a sanitization procedure that initializes critical pointers to NULL, aka the "Publisher Invalid Memory Reference Vulnerability". receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
9.3 AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
weakness
CWE-399
affected versions
microsoft publisher 2007

check it yourself archive.cert.uni-stuttgart.de docs.microsoft.com securitytracker.com research.eeye.com vupen.com oval.cisecurity.org +4 morereceipt

Dated events

2023-03-07EPSS moved 0.47 to 0.942026-06-15EPSS moved 0.63 to 0.33

Movement the material steps

4 Feb 20220.46718
7 Mar 20230.9418 · crossed 0.50 and 0.90 · scoring model v2023.03.01
5 Apr 20240.87255 · crossed 0.90
17 Dec 20240.95105 · crossed 0.90
17 Mar 20250.62213 · crossed 0.90 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.32782 · crossed 0.50 · scoring model v2026.06.15
Show all 20 observations
4 Feb 20220.46718
7 Mar 20230.9418
8 Mar 20230.94180
31 Mar 20230.90689
6 May 20230.90209
12 Dec 20230.91838
5 Apr 20240.87255
13 May 20240.89773
17 Dec 20240.95105
19 Jan 20250.95072
15 Mar 20250.95224
17 Mar 20250.62213
19 Mar 20250.69226
20 Mar 20250.62213
27 Mar 20250.69226
28 Mar 20250.62213
29 Mar 20250.69226
30 Mar 20250.62213
27 Feb 20260.62554
15 Jun 20260.32782

20 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.32782Published2007-07-10Index as of2026-06-15

The record had been public for 18 years, 11 months when this index was last written.

Published 2007-07-10 receipt · Index as of 2026-06-15 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-399. The index holds 2695 prior instances of this class, 11 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2010-0806matches 6 of 6KEV listed · 2010receipt
CVE-2018-0154 · Cisco IOSnothing comparable heldKEV listed · 2018receipt
CVE-2018-0156 · Cisco IOS and IOS XEnothing comparable heldKEV listed · 2018receipt
CVE-2018-0161 · Cisco IOSnothing comparable heldKEV listed · 2018receipt
CVE-2018-0179 · Cisco IOSnothing comparable heldKEV listed · 2018receipt
CVE-2018-0180 · Cisco IOSnothing comparable heldKEV listed · 2018receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

2695 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2007-1754.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.