vciy

CVE-2007-0882

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Argument injection vulnerability in the telnet daemon (in.telnetd) in Solaris 10 and 11 (SunOS 5.10 and 5.11) misinterprets certain client "-f"…

CVE-2007-08823 of 4 sources documented this
55

rank 55 = 25 + 25 + 0 + 5 + 0

rank@v1 · this cycle

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.98013  ·  without this subject the record ranks 30

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 10.0, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 30

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

no persisting rise in 365 days  ·  without this subject the record ranks 55

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

4 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 50

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 55

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$4.89Mover the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movement-$603,000on 2024-02-15, the last material move, 2 years, 6 months before this reading
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$4.89M = $4.99M incident cost x 1 exposure x 0.98013 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.98013EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity10 CRITICALreceipt
Harmtotal loss · unauthenticatedreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseno fix version held
Movementsteadyreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2025-03-17, 542 days at 0.98, as of 2026-09-10. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

GNU InetutilsMikrotik RouterOSCVE-2024-41710AtlassianCVE-2016-100330882

This record is one instance of CWE-88, improper neutralization of argument delimiters in a command ('argument injection'). The index holds 456 prior instances of this class, 5 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. taxonomy@v1

Full pattern panel

Prior records in this weakness class. Each is its own record, dated and receipted.
Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signal

Check a version against this record

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no authentication · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v2.0 · NVD's vectorreceipt
Weakness classCWE-88 Improper Neutralization of Argument Delimiters in a Command ('Argument Injection')receipt
Published consequencesCWE-88: Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability, Other: Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Alter Execution Logic, Read Application Data, Modify Application Data[email protected]

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed inNo fix version in held sources, as the index stood on 10 Sep 2026.
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, NVD10 CRITICALreceipt
Exploit probability0.98013 · top 0.09% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth2 products across 2 vendorsderived
Assigned bymitrereceipt
Recorded changes24 · last 14 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Named in the CPE rangesOracle solaris; Sunosreceipt
Published rangesoracle solaris 10; oracle solaris 11; sunos 5.10; sunos 5.11receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

Argument injection vulnerability in the telnet daemon (in.telnetd) in Solaris 10 and 11 (SunOS 5.10 and 5.11) misinterprets certain client "-f" sequences as valid requests for the login program to skip authentication, which allows remote attackers to log into certain accounts, as demonstrated by the bin account. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
10 AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
weakness
CWE-88
affected versions
oracle solaris 10; oracle solaris 11; sunos 5.10; and 1 more, listed in full below

check it yourself securityfocus.com vupen.com exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com kb.cert.org oval.cisecurity.org erratasec.blogspot.com +13 morereceipt

Dated events

2023-03-07EPSS moved 0.79 to 0.972026-06-15EPSS moved 0.91 to 0.98

Movement the material steps

4 Feb 20220.78891
7 Mar 20230.97164 · crossed 0.90 · scoring model v2023.03.01
15 Feb 20240.85248 · crossed 0.90
17 Mar 20250.91299 · crossed 0.90 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.97742 · scoring model v2026.06.15
10 Sep 20260.98013
Show all 24 observations
4 Feb 20220.78891
7 Mar 20230.97164
27 Mar 20230.97239
4 May 20230.97197
17 Jul 20230.97292
9 Nov 20230.97286
17 Dec 20230.97328
15 Feb 20240.85248
2 Mar 20240.84502
9 Apr 20240.86526
18 May 20240.84370
24 Aug 20240.85363
17 Dec 20240.83429
17 Mar 20250.91299
24 Mar 20250.9135
29 Mar 20250.91959
30 Mar 20250.9135
1 Oct 20250.91063
15 Jan 20260.90964
4 Jun 20260.90954
15 Jun 20260.97742
20 Jun 20260.97892
24 Jun 20260.97848
10 Sep 20260.98013

24 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.98013Published2007-02-12Index as of2026-09-10

The record had been public for 19 years, 6 months when this index was last written.

Published 2007-02-12 receipt · Index as of 2026-09-10 derived

The pattern, elsewhere

This record is one instance of CWE-88, improper neutralization of argument delimiters in a command ('argument injection'). The index holds 456 prior instances of this class, 5 KEV-listed. The nearest of its KEV-listed records are drawn beside this. [email protected]

CVE-2026-24061 · GNU Inetutilsnothing comparable heldKEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2026-86060 · Mikrotik RouterOSnothing comparable heldKEV listed · 2026receipt
CVE-2024-41710nothing comparable heldKEV listed · 2024receipt
CVE-2022-36804 · Atlassian Bitbucket Servernothing comparable heldKEV listed · 2022receipt
CVE-2016-10033nothing comparable heldKEV listed · 2016receipt

"Matches n of m" counts the attributes the two records can both be compared on: the CVSS metrics they share a version of, any weakness class beyond this one, and the vendor. fit-rules@v1

456 records in this class held. The six above are drawn from the ones CISA has listed as exploited, ranked by how much of the record matches this one. That is why every one of them is KEV-listed: the pool is, so the colour on those spokes says nothing the pool has not already said.

No curated product neighbourhood is held for this product, so the records above are the nearest this index can name. The neighbourhood table covers a small set of products and is extended by hand.

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2007-0882.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.