vciy

CVE-2006-5633

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Firefox 1.5.0.7 and 2.0, and Seamonkey 1.1b, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) by creating a range object using…

CVE-2006-56333 of 4 sources documented this
21

rank 21 = 2 + 13 + 1 + 5 + 0

rank@v1 · backlog

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.07039  ·  without this subject the record ranks 19

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 5.0, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 8

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

rose on 2026-05-14  ·  without this subject the record ranks 20

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

3 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 16

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 21

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$101,000over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movementno material movementthe record holds only daily drift and scoring model releases
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$101,000 = $4.99M incident cost x 0.28625080150224425 exposure x 0.07039 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.07039EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity5 MEDIUMreceipt
Harmunauthenticated · networkreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseno fix version held
Movementfallenreceipt
PLATEAU10Minimal movement since 2026-06-15, 44 days at 0.07, as of 2026-07-29. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

No weakness class or product neighbourhood is held for this record, so this index cannot name anywhere to check next. That is an absence in the record, not a finding about the software.

Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signal

Check a version against this record

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no authentication · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactPartial availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v2.0 · NVD's vectorreceipt
Weakness classNo CWE mapping in held sources.

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed inNo fix version in held sources, as the index stood on 29 Jul 2026.
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, NVD5 MEDIUMreceipt
Exploit probability0.07039 · top 6% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth2 products across 1 vendorderived
Assigned bymitrereceipt
Recorded changes16 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Named in the CPE rangesMozilla firefox; Mozilla seamonkeyreceipt
Published rangesmozilla firefox 1.5.0.7; mozilla firefox 2.0; mozilla seamonkey 1.1receipt

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

Firefox 1.5.0.7 and 2.0, and Seamonkey 1.1b, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) by creating a range object using createRange, calling selectNode on a DocType node (DOCUMENT_TYPE_NODE), then calling createContextualFragment on the range, which triggers a null dereference. NOTE: the original Bugtraq post mentioned that code execution was possible, but followup analysis has shown that it is only a null dereference. receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
5 AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
affected versions
mozilla firefox 1.5.0.7; mozilla firefox 2.0; mozilla seamonkey 1.1

check it yourself securityfocus.com securityfocus.com securityfocus.com lists.grok.org.uk bugzilla.mozilla.org exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com +5 morereceipt

Dated events

2023-03-07EPSS moved 0.35 to 0.432025-03-17EPSS moved 0.41 to 0.152026-06-15EPSS moved 0.20 to 0.07

Movement the material steps

4 Feb 20220.35205
7 Mar 20230.43254 · scoring model v2023.03.01
17 Mar 20250.15222 · scoring model v2025.03.14
15 Jun 20260.06861 · crossed 0.10 · scoring model v2026.06.15
29 Jul 20260.07039
Show all 16 observations
4 Feb 20220.35205
7 Mar 20230.43254
20 Jun 20230.42748
28 Jul 20230.38348
4 Sep 20230.39831
19 Nov 20230.38776
4 Feb 20240.38298
12 May 20240.40727
17 Mar 20250.15222
29 Mar 20250.13595
30 Mar 20250.15222
19 Jun 20250.15729
3 Oct 20250.1608
14 May 20260.19794
15 Jun 20260.06861
29 Jul 20260.07039

16 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.07039Published2006-10-31Index as of2026-07-29

The record had been public for 19 years, 8 months when this index was last written.

Published 2006-10-31 receipt · Index as of 2026-07-29 derived

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2006-5633.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.