vciy

CVE-2004-0385

INDEX BUILT · 2026-09-20

No source can show you its own past. This one can.

Print this page to keep the view as it stands on this date. Everything hidden behind a disclosure opens, and every receipt prints with its value.

Heap-based buffer overflow in Oracle 9i Application Server Web Cache 9.0.4.0.0, 9.0.3.1.0, 9.0.2.3.0, and 9.0.0.4.0 allows remote attackers to…

CVE-2004-03853 of 4 sources documented this
36

rank 36 = 4 + 25 + 1 + 6 + 0

rank@v1 · scheduled

Someone is already using it

CISA KEV catalog · public proof-of-concept · FIRST EPSS

EPSS 0.15501  ·  without this subject the record ranks 32

What it costs you if it fires

NVD CVSS base score, then the CNA's own

CVSS 10.0, from NVD  ·  without this subject the record ranks 11

It is getting worse, not staying still

FIRST EPSS series, rescorings and bad loads removed

rose on 2025-12-20  ·  without this subject the record ranks 35

How much of the world it touches

NVD CPE configurations

5 products in the CPE ranges  ·  without this subject the record ranks 30

Someone else already set the date

CISA KEV remediation due date

no CISA due date  ·  without this subject the record ranks 36

Unaudited dollar value2 of 3 inputs carry a receipt
Exposure$773,000over the next 30 days, if this record is yours
Movement-$434,000on 2024-12-17, the last material move, 1 year, 5 months before this reading
Basisassumeda published average, not your estate

$773,000 = $4.99M incident cost x 1 exposure x 0.15501 likelihood

udv@v1 · unaudited · wrong for you until you say what you run

$4.99M is the cost of a breach that happened, from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, global average. It is not the value of any asset of yours. That average already covers breaches of every severity, so scaling it by exposure understates a partial-impact record. That is an assumption, not a measurement. Your own asset value goes in the decision record.

Hindsight · the state

0.15501EPSSNOT IN KEVas of 2026-09-20
Severity10 CRITICALreceipt
Harmtotal loss · unauthenticatedreceipt
Exploitationnone in held sources
Defenseno fix version held
Movementscoring model changedreceipt
RISING10Risen from 0.1127 to 0.15501 across 10 observations. arc-rules@v1

Foresight · where to check next

No weakness class or product neighbourhood is held for this record, so this index cannot name anywhere to check next. That is an absence in the record, not a finding about the software.

Color is a claim, not decoration:the hostile worldthe defenseno signal

Check a version against this record

A deterministic range check against the ranges this record publishes. It tells you where a version sits in the record, not whether your deployment is exploitable. No account needed.

Watch this record

Matches your own product list against every record this index holds, and tells you when one of them moves.

What counts as a move

Set up a watchlist (needs a Practitioner account)

Record your call

Keep your verdict, your reason and the evidence together. The record takes its date when you save it.

AcceptDeferPatch by…Not affectedMitigated

Choose your verdict, then sign in or use an email link. Your first 100 records are free. Evidence is frozen when the record is created.

Private to your organization unless you share it. Put the proof link in your ticket so a reviewer can inspect the basis for your call. See how decision records work.

Harm, if it fires from the vector and the weakness

Written for the ticket you're about to file.

Reachnetwork-reachable · no authentication · low attack complexityreceipt
ImpactComplete confidentiality, integrity and availability lossreceipt
Scored fromCVSS v2.0 · NVD's vectorreceipt
Weakness classNo CWE mapping in held sources.

CISA KEV & Federal Remediation Deadline from the record and CISA

The fix, and how long it's been waiting.

Fixed inNo fix version in held sources, as the index stood on 15 Jun 2026.
Patch available sinceNo dated patch-availability record in held sources. The index holds reference URLs without dates and only the current revision of the CVE record, so the day a fix first existed cannot be derived. Only the versions it landed in.

Exploit Status & Known PoCs a ladder, not a score

Current rung: Nothing observed in held sources.

  • RUNG 1Nothing observed in held sources
  • RUNG 2Proof-of-concept published
  • RUNG 3Exploited in the wild · CISA KEV listed
  • RUNG 4Ransomware campaign use known

Authority who says so

CVSS, NVD10 CRITICALreceipt
Exploit probability0.15501 · top 3% of all CVEsreceipt
Blast breadth2 products across 1 vendorderived
Assigned bymitrereceipt
Recorded changes10 · last 19 Sep 2026derived

Affected & Fixed Versions as published

Named in the CPE rangesOracle application server web cache; Oracle e-business suite 11ireceipt
Published rangesoracle application server web cache 9.0.0.4.0; oracle application server web cache 9.0.2.3.0; oracle application server web cache 9.0.3.1.0; oracle application server web cache 9.0.4.0.0receipt
Show all 5 published ranges
oracle application server web cache 9.0.0.4.0
oracle application server web cache 9.0.2.3.0
oracle application server web cache 9.0.3.1.0
oracle application server web cache 9.0.4.0.0
oracle e-business suite 11i

A rung lights from a row in the index, never from an assessment. "Held sources" is the true scope of the claim: this index reads the CVE record, NVD, CISA KEV, FIRST's EPSS and public proof-of-concept repositories, and it does not observe attacks.

Did this affect your environment?Answering needs an account.

What it is stated by the CNA

Heap-based buffer overflow in Oracle 9i Application Server Web Cache 9.0.4.0.0, 9.0.3.1.0, 9.0.2.3.0, and 9.0.0.4.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long HTTP request method header to the Web Cache listener. NOTE: due to the vagueness of the Oracle advisory, it is not clear whether there are additional issues besides this overflow, although the advisory alludes to multiple "vulnerabilities." receipt

NVD's analysis a second authority

severity
10 AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
affected versions
oracle application server web cache 9.0.0.4.0; oracle application server web cache 9.0.2.3.0; oracle application server web cache 9.0.3.1.0; and 2 more, listed in full below

check it yourself inaccessnetworks.com otn.oracle.com exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com osvdb.org secunia.com marc.info +4 morereceipt

Dated events

2023-03-07EPSS moved 0.11 to 0.472026-06-15EPSS moved 0.44 to 0.16

Movement the material steps

4 Feb 20220.1127
7 Mar 20230.46676 · scoring model v2023.03.01
24 Mar 20230.12357
17 Dec 20240.05344 · crossed 0.10
17 Mar 20250.28604 · crossed 0.10 · scoring model v2025.03.14
19 Mar 20250.38816
15 Jun 20260.15501 · scoring model v2026.06.15
Show all 10 observations
4 Feb 20220.1127
7 Mar 20230.46676
24 Mar 20230.12357
1 May 20240.14035
17 Dec 20240.05344
12 Feb 20250.04484
17 Mar 20250.28604
19 Mar 20250.38816
20 Dec 20250.44246
15 Jun 20260.15501

10 observations held. A highlighted step crossed a promotion threshold. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the instrument was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed. receipt

The full biography

EPSS 0.15501Published2004-04-16Index as of2026-06-15

The record had been public for 22 years, 1 month when this index was last written.

Published 2004-04-16 receipt · Index as of 2026-06-15 derived

Siblings and hubs

Records related to this one

Browse the index from here

These are index-wide views, not findings about CVE-2004-0385.

What usually comes next

Everything above needs no account. What is below is work: assembling it, scoping it to your estate, watching it, and handing it to someone else.

Everything on this page is free. Public data. Withholding it protects nothing.